Daily social media use, sleep quality, and anxiety levels among university students: a cross-sectional survey

What this example demonstrates

• States provisional Major Revision decision with overall score 42/100 when only one of five reviewer reports is usable.
• Lists critical issues from the EIC report: incremental novelty, large β* effect size, data anomalies, undocumented ethics/sampling, single-item measures.
• Summarizes internal consistency checks on mediation arithmetic cited in the review.
• Uses structured headings (Editorial Decision, Critical Issues, Consensus notes) suitable for revision planning.
• Does not invent missing reviewer content—explicitly notes empty Methodology/Domain/Perspective reports.

First pages preview

How this paper was generated

1. 1

   Upload target PDF

   The psychology survey sample PDF was uploaded to Paper Review.

2. 2

   Multi-reviewer simulation

   Data2Paper generated reviewer personas, an EIC synthesis, decision tier, and issue list (~3 minutes).

3. 3

   Download report PDF

   13-page review PDF shown here is unedited output for format reference.